A Spot of History: When Germany invaded
Belgium on August 4, 1914, Hugh Gibson was
Hugh Gibson, Library of Congress |
In those
critical first months of the war, Hugh -- as a diplomat from a neutral country --
was a tireless worker. He crisscrossed the little Low Country as an American
observer, traveled back and forth to England to help establish food relief, and
aided in developing the working relationship between the CRB, the CN (Comite
Nationale), and the German occupying government.
That's all
in the official records.
Unofficially,
there was a lot more to Hugh.
He was
renowned as a practical joker with a dry, biting sense of humor. Many photos of him during
this time seem to bear this out as they show an imp of a man with a secretive
smile and lively face.
One of his
more complicated practical jokes -- which backfired monumentally -- was known by
the moniker, Fort Jako (the name of a Belgian insane asylum). Sadly, for anyone reading this
blog, the story is too involved -- and too good -- to retell here, so you'll
have to wait and read it in my finished book.
As for Hugh's
dry humor: He once described someone as "the man who can strut sitting
down." [multiple sources.]
And after a
visit to Louvain (the famous university town decimated by the Germans), he told
CRBer Prentiss Gray: "I had my Kodak with me and I asked a German officer
in one of the streets near the University if I might take a picture. 'Go right
ahead,' he said, 'there are some very good ones in that house over
there.'" [Source: HHPL, Gibson Collection]
Using his
keen observational skills, Hugh documented many of the war's large and small
events in his diary, letters and well-written book, A
Journal from our Legation in Belgium (Doubleday, 1917).
Altogether,
Hugh was a guy I would have loved to share a few beers with.
My post: I've just returned from three
full days of research at the Herbert Hoover Presidential Library (HHPL) in West
Branch, Iowa. I must say that Matt Schaefer, Spencer Howard and Craig Wright (the
archive staff) were knowledgeable, helpful and friendly. They not only found
what I was looking for, but also found what I didn't even know existed (yet needed).
Thanks, guys! I wish all my library research trips were as easy, fun and
productive.
(On a cuisine note, lovers of oatmeal raisin cookies should take note that one of the best I've ever tasted was at the intimate little Reid's Beans Coffee Shoppe Cafe, www.reidsbeans.com, on Main Street, West Branch.)
(On a cuisine note, lovers of oatmeal raisin cookies should take note that one of the best I've ever tasted was at the intimate little Reid's Beans Coffee Shoppe Cafe, www.reidsbeans.com, on Main Street, West Branch.)
Because I'm still in the collection stage of this project (see post #14 for the various stages), I was at HHPL not to read and assimilate information, but to skim and gather possibly relevant material that I'll read later. As such, I was highly successful, making 740 photocopies and taking 270 digital photos of articles, documents, diaries, letters and images. This complements all the material I collected at HHPL during my research visit in 2011 and through my research-via-mail in 1985.
Next week, I
go to Princeton for three days of research at the Firestone and Mudd libraries.
Two weeks later, I go to the Hoover Institution (HI) on the Stanford campus for
four days of the same.
Once those
trips are done, I'll have the lion's share of my collection stage completed and
it will be time to begin the critical -- and difficult -- read/assimilate/index
stage.
I've already
been thinking about this stage and how it will reveal what I need to
include -- and, more importantly, exclude -- in my finished book.
To me, the conceptualizing of my CRB book is similar to how I approached my travel articles during my 13 years as a freelance travel writer. Before I left on a trip, I would learn as much as I could about the destination. Most times, I would have a general idea of what my topic/theme/angle might be for the articles I'd write. But in the end, it was only after experiencing the place that I would know for sure what my angle was. Sometimes it would be what I had envisioned pre-trip, but many times, because of my experiences, the angle would have morphed into something completely different.
Right now, the
understanding of the CRB I gained from my 1980s research has given me a general idea of
what my book's structure should be. But I know it will be only after immersing
myself in the newly collected material that I'll "see" the true
structure and content of my book.
Then -- like sculptors
have explained in the past -- I hope to chisel away all the extra material from the unformed block so the the book I've envisioned is revealed.
I know I'm
starting with a GREAT block, it now remains to be seen if my chisel is up to
the task.
End of post.
No comments:
Post a Comment